Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge Crypto timeout and PTO (#2806)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sat, 13 July 2019 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E7312019F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfi2i8sfvWnJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A865012019C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:31:50 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563017510; bh=PirVb1C35ie4qrUVKBBbt2scspHMHda2ur1u2kFmRnM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nALY0q5vN41vqlkVYe3affcbjSjhNy+7qmzZGcBdiVHWMO2MYqdMpSi1nxzRxeH+d YNtGG83+eTY7JICt5LbBm+vI8EAGwfie4D2xEndIAReApsETIMRW/pAs6Y4jnBW0Vh uySr1Tllyxrw95CnWsgmxSPu5KfQdWRRg1P1x1E0=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK46O5Z4ZGNODKYMDCF3G3Z2NEVBNHHBWSJPJ4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2806/review/261538153@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2806@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2806@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge Crypto timeout and PTO (#2806)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d29c12664459_4b8c3f8042acd96839749d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/AJ1vbKMZyZmuT24AsHXz-iRUvfQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 11:31:54 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> +data.  If no data can be sent, then the PTO alarm MUST NOT be armed until
+data has been received from the client.
+
+Because the server could be blocked until more packets are received, the client
+MUST ensure that the retransmission timer is set if the client does not yet
+have 1-RTT keys.  If the probe timer expires before the client has 1-RTT keys,
+it is possible that the client may not have any crypto data to retransmit.
+However, the client MUST send a new packet, containing only PADDING frames if
+necessary, to allow the server to continue sending data. If Handshake keys
+are available to the client, it MUST send a Handshake packet, and otherwise
+it MUST send an Initial packet in a UDP datagram of at least 1200 bytes.
+
+Because Initial packets only containing PADDING do not elicit an
+acknowledgement, they may never be acknowledged, but they are removed from
+bytes in flight when the client gets Handshake keys and the Initial keys are
+discarded.

#2895 filed

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2806#discussion_r303202308