Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rename "retransmittable" frames and packets (#1595)

Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Sun, 11 November 2018 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A695012D4E8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:17:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9MrpLchl4fr3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:17:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64C8128D0C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:17:17 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541913437; bh=/+JvgM94xkh3y3RfZvy0HeOvVA76FIODKvfNjUD1bJs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Kh0dQ75fM2AcnRpOAbyN/hrrIzD9wBCSRPWOiXVRwPSvlcv9sz3JxXpkTxTB+53xP 1WmTHU3BNeO6eTS99tb6MXPlZrDcKtidEJxRqdqIJLmwLPkhG35unmYQIxKgIXS0tv fasBE52ehJbSbK30PXEZTVFr3DNx1K1izpslBJKo=
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4a2f608eb54a61c9e9bfa7f8b3731aa6c224208a92cf0000000117ff7d5d92a169ce147c6344@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595/437644640@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rename "retransmittable" frames and packets (#1595)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be7bb5d4256_27df3f91602d45c02135ce"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/AVSVRh2XoAjQWQ4QHKxovhJaRj0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 05:17:20 -0000

> it's simply the case that "ackent" is not a word.

Sure it is: you just used it several times above.  A dictionary is not a legal document.

> It's perhaps worth pointing out that an "indulgent" person is a person who indulges. [...]

I listed "indulgent" thinking of being "indulgent to" -- that is, deriving from the transitive version of the verb "to indulge" (which is the first meaning).  My thinking was that being indulgent to someone is to invite (cause) more behavior of the same kind.  Thinking more about this, however, makes me realize that this adjective is not part of the group listed about, as "indulgent" does not cause indulgence.

> "Truculent," various +1, smiling emojis:

I'll see how you laugh when the "ack-eliciting" beast lands and you have to a) say or think it and b) make enums like `FRAME_ACK_ELICITING`.  Blech!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-437644640