Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify section on negotiating connection IDs (#3349)

Nick Banks <> Wed, 15 January 2020 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2D81208EA for <>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:45:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYn-I6VlWbZR for <>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179F612089C for <>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A7FC61141 for <>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:45:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579121117; bh=vW3T/tQnzxY8UxcwL5eEOVZ7fFhCQaaDTrkhACP1bVQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mzxrpcZYvmXTmPy/jvcY4CWNfwr0oY1q/vIRfcoRdac6AMgT6nNM+3XYl8O+hkZcs ZuEiOxW9RjEOQqOQPBYqBSIDoVkQskyqFL6QchmykH3SU2j28cSjDcsUKlTcEP/XKO USDpHBIF+EDxxUngsnflbreZNRDsvNRVG/gw/NrY=
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:45:17 -0800
From: Nick Banks <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3349/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify section on negotiating connection IDs (#3349)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1f79dd66ef5_5383fdd572cd96c14714c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:45:24 -0000

nibanks commented on this pull request.

> +the SCID supplied by the server as the DCID for subsequent packets, including
+all subsequent 0-RTT packets. This means that a client might change the DCID

I think it might just be best to explicitly state which packet types require use of the new DCID. Not mentioning handshake packets here just leaves it unclear IMO.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: