Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a Retry really need to change the CID? (#2837)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F59120024 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wGNk1EXphto for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57DF120088 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:26:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1566267960; bh=7B081s2+ioKiYl5CC+KNtsBdDCJX0MiVvrXSMupArrM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bf4g4G/N9t38osdqk8hkiBSt7Y5xl4hQtPnoGr/jDwwKJZ6rpftYhL90cmSiHgmXd zwsK8n2pswnKvrGot1KZvKyHvDgzG48uTepIsD6skGJOvSdeDmNozxiMo71YHnZ93f K1bDwm3Vhw49wFol1K7VFslifIogoIqRxxJUYNkY=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZUP7OTFDJK6BVEHFN3NCGLREVBNHHBW2NK2Q@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2837/522826023@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2837@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2837@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a Retry really need to change the CID? (#2837)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d5b5a38d1233_4d313fc7d3ccd960402055"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ac8WqOyQmtWWW0A2tIbOZFp0gTo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:26:03 -0000

OK, I think that I'm getting my wires crossed.  I think that changing CID is valuable because it then forces the server to demonstrate continuity.  It's keeping the keys constant (per #2823) that has the added value.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2837#issuecomment-522826023