Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection abort during handshake (#597)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AA3126D46 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Ru8NU_wFI7i for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE83127337 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=zhDSItI22ZVQDQA9X5lKBqgX40U=; b=IIocT4T8vtr14/oH 5c9lw3XkyZiI+dOtpQ/h2DQMdXa8I1pdnC84ARytU2IcQ5SCJysTNovuqjSCz+YH 6PYh3TPPlZ6hkUFTPdKlOzpWq53yHirALXweTEjfO8f4UffKewuhtpGLfltdvdyd Hm5fKxFnhpiY9h0qcv/n2humVQg=
Received: by filter0515p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0515p1mdw1-20264-5937A263-29 2017-06-07 06:51:15.45549699 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id VFbcIvIeREWuzZEsRnFP-Q for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:51:15.478 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 23:51:15 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab6213bb3c1196bf9449f694e16d884a27ce98c68d92cf00000001154f646392a169ce0df28989@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/597/306703550@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/597@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/597@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection abort during handshake (#597)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5937a2635b30d_33db3fe30dc3bc2c52ea"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak23P5PsBleHOmF4yeKwwDbUGEuyI45JTIsMqC WFBq6K2ZOrbChvS8n57ohMwxMzdl4yvZgNYTDfbTZYPTnaxCkohvaqrO0CGhReNsYNFTvDRp6FFTAm 2coMWpo4ltHZiBTJJkW/Vi7j8hE8dqO1GZCUdmvuTwc2BBKriNZrB40FqPtOVlGc2nchRscn3ZEEx3 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/AvaSmjnf0rGYJoyxgsdy-9RCvCM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:51:24 -0000

I guess one counter argument to my issue is that the 5-tuple is hard to guess for an observer, but it really is only one port number that is hard to guess, and that port number might not be generated as random as one would hope on all platforms.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/597#issuecomment-306703550