Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss max-header-list-size from the other side (#2774)

Lucas Pardue <> Tue, 18 June 2019 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAC7120436 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.463
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fE6yGQyHUrOt for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB7712040D for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:23:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560878610; bh=oZ8/zJbe3Rz3OrvBhI7JuqOlVlwhG3DTkS2FY/c621g=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xMdb/p0U24a/J2AsAgLsJCePXchvBy7UE3vBHH2MnXZ2HHIddS0k3IH4KLjvzHrQq 6OgI9BYjg5QEnLmc3wDvE6CfnZqFi6BA+QNLGjw+CezpkLhk6QJMXWDkEDmncSdRs1 IsOZbr+PDpKsCHYNoFsj8ZycgECGXgX9YM/KNrhM=
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2774/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss max-header-list-size from the other side (#2774)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d091e12751b7_49e53fe75c2cd96c392773"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:23:40 -0000

LPardue approved this pull request.

This looks better. I'll add an observation point that RFC 6585 says a 431 can be generated "when a single header field is at fault.". I don't think we need any specific text there to handle it.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: