Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest received packet number (#3541)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 03:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6097D3A199E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pnOvvz09lIqe for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D33E3A07AA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:23:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585624980; bh=9tO9nceRvIrCj7SOMg22tqHq/EdR/wthvx6Bz/dQ1XQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=n2f/crd4390hscNe7jUVsfqZJtxJhkkVE0ZGk5AAhURAaoZ2VppNA4eJilIXpgQzt sfhWLoqmSrE/SeQsXR+f81zytBty4bQvfHYVWc1xpo341ZK9PRv78Yy3xXdsiVXpDW lDJ6Xw/quf50hhoqgGw64xoSNDpqEYlLovsQvERY=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6S26G6UO3TCNS2JKV4R2MJJEVBNHHCF233TE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541/606375627@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest received packet number (#3541)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e82b79458645_2e663fbce74cd9641076c5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/BEQvirUr3SL5rIboyEFb5_Qz_IQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:23:02 -0000
I was under the impression that the argument was that largest acknowledged was not being tracked, but Ian made it clear that the concern was about not signaling it. That removes key updates as a concern. If [this comment](https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541#issuecomment-604819826) remains unclear, then I can't really do better. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541#issuecomment-606375627
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest receiv… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson