Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 12.2 Coalescing Packets (#2900)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Tue, 16 July 2019 01:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41202120141 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VIQBt1vxFaCM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7744120177 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:53:21 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563242002; bh=7G/+AkV/VN4mqmWIyPVwsi29sf7LI9NdHvl38o/qMUU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MmlU5QvrD3ARqmCItRX1g0fN1iramCKUWAaTwuUC4fp1+O3SOPuKoRDTUoWJQTJA9 sJQD5H8YZH7BBwZNtfP2lIVM9d7S2nn87+6pOFnbkS+hfeibU+oZKr62yLAbhJ+WU2 PxsgpeC3UVwBttWKmyhMDW2ah7XrG2f7M7xwoz/A=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZU6ZAJEXXQKLBRDON3HJQJDEVBNHHBX2UGWQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2900/511632885@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2900@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2900@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 12.2 Coalescing Packets (#2900)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2d2e11e7c3d_59813fc5fa6cd964100873"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/BbKPSni8hdg1sGwktSgYnqTixzY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:53:24 -0000
I went back and double checked. I thought Length followed the packet number, which is variable length, but it does seem to precede the field. Perhaps all that does need to be done is to remove that sentence then. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2900#issuecomment-511632885
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 12.2 … anrossi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Small clarification in 1… ianswett