Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame special rules (#3776)

[Jana Iyengar <[e-mail]>]

@janaiyengar commented on this pull request.

I like this a lot! I know there are just one frame type for C and F, but I have an editorial suggestion that just makes it more uniform and easier to read IMO.

> +: Packets containing only ACK frames do not count toward bytes in flight for
+  congestion control purposes; see {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.

```suggestion
: Packets containing only frames with this marking do not count toward bytes
  in flight for congestion control purposes; see {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
```

> +characters:
+
+N:
+: Packets containing only frames with this marking are not ack-eliciting; see
+  {{generating-acks}}.
+
+C:
+: Packets containing only ACK frames do not count toward bytes in flight for
+  congestion control purposes; see {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
+
+P:
+: Packets containing only frames with this marking can be used to probe new
+  network paths during connection migration; see {{probing}}.
+
+F:
+: The content of the STREAM frame are flow controlled; see {{flow-control}}.

```suggestion
: The content of frames with this marking are flow controlled; see {{flow-control}}.
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3776#pullrequestreview-433672736