Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Definition of "active connection ID" is misleading (or the name is) (#3200)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 07 November 2019 01:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B2B12006E for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 17:51:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFG863gxCCRE for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 17:51:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49A3E120045 for <>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 17:51:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:51:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573091504; bh=pRLH6ffEVnzs0C9hAuiDePBXFU2LvKXIGgxLBfBdW50=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gN9AclMM4k0xKDFjlaK/VFiQf/j7XvpR+6S2Yoaqbyrh6F2fI9ic+WplNg7cbqH20 oLvufuV/rT5f9U6L60IC9lI8CfRvhPlOxtz/ztEWOYhEWSG7ste2cxg7Z/6fwiEeJb hDiDS3wZvCiZNeXOkzF5YC3wnbDiy2H1BjU8Q110=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3200/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Definition of "active connection ID" is misleading (or the name is) (#3200)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc378b044ead_6d053fcc42ecd96817343b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 01:51:47 -0000

Isn't it impossible to agree on whether a given connection ID was used?  In particular, connection IDs sent on unusable paths won't be received by the issuer to allow them to know that they a no longer unused.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: