IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Solidarity bot: Invalid (Issue #4965)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Wed, 16 March 2022 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897063A0FC4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCQZldpHekXV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D281A3A0F74 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B4F720D7C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1647391939; bh=2N7C5NsUi5e7cAODb07xtFvmi8T9+H2N8L9ctIxuYeE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yZ0AtsWoC8nrCAgDqXIKwr0a5ynIeOAsM9YfY0aCG1h+zCzzizzMbWs/UYT1GvEtw s0JQvm5urZhDSAZsWgLPtrFmdCLYtihbqnjEkkLaqADtVHLvAQ9OmI9Ro7jGQai2Mc m19Ieybtb2pAQ3aVDYFD/Gic8d5iez55Wox6qM4s=
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:52:19 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5NR4H2KQP75MYQ47OAHZTUHEVBNHHELKL5CE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4965/1068615789@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4965@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4965@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Solidarity bot: Invalid (Issue #4965)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_623134c3cb4f5_47a7c6fc51373"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/BwUHKIw1RFzQUNfjkD3Oe6CLi_4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:52:26 -0000

Agree.

I'll also highlight that the previous version of the bot didn't flag this term in the period it was running and we were more actively developing the document. Apply discretion to tooling updates against the status of our work seems fair. Here things are very late  the draft is already running in wide deployments.

In other documents for this WG, we have a bit more flexibility to incorporate the bots suggestions.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4965#issuecomment-1068615789
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4965/1068615789@github.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email