[quicwg/base-drafts] Ekr wglc comments (#3856)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 July 2020 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EB43A0FCA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2KkzPJLESW3x for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A863E3A0FCD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net []) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AD82822D2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594175084; bh=uXJih2XDFJFmvGxlPR79zZa+W1a4ZDXkso1Clv/E8Ss=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=apndY91p/8HZoEMt9OYY+blUcN4v8CqTqUcZ5LbFREXIRMQfGO76M8l+Gac411j7A DfBrJx5wbMIFLzPgFm2F1h/QwGRBlOuNdhj5wRsIaOc9gkh/7Ce5DVXpZTJUFmUW1c 6zJryS0zzK2b4+KtkD5azd0hZeyyj/DlcmBndzks=
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:24:44 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7DLRBAVVAJCSOSC4N5CEHWZEVBNHHCN2NFVM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3856@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ekr wglc comments (#3856)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f052e6cd4325_16b03ffcaf8cd96c2403b4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/BwceXjOh4FkpckNVOay3fyG79G4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:24:51 -0000

Hopefully some minor editorial changes.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:


-- Commit Summary --

  * Clarify opaque
  * Clarify gthe ? in the encoding language
  * Don&#39;t say that unidirectional is a long message. That just confuses things
  * Clarify the example of stream IDs
  * Clarify the stream ID limits. Remove redundancy
  * You actually don&#39;t know definitively how many bytes were sent
  * early data -&gt; 0-RTT data
  * Fix description of the results of Version Negotiation. Remind me why this isn&#39;t called Version Error...
  * You don&#39;t change SCID on later packets
  * Clarify impact of on-path spoofing
  * Clarify awkward text around preferred connection
  * Tiny wording change
  * Retry packets don&#39;t use keys derived from the handshake
  * One follows the guidance
  * Remove commas, this is a restrictive clause
  * includes -&gt; included
  * Clarify which field

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (110)

-- Patch Links --


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: