IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify padding of INITIAL packets (#3255)

Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477581200C3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:09:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H31hKPfpj4tu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD47412011D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cd7bc13.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.102]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DB49609F3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:09:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574201371; bh=GfKVNwXLynN7i8sOH5O/dJ+tD/XHzLzqn/dxea4/NlE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QiA7eRCTjHrtM+9j8f3iwhe5rYFRQ8cQ/48Jez5QJ5Sxh1zL9AuZobi87keOIU5WI SoY4WdLF3TEltW+WWEL252n6g5KESQAs+aTIwb9DGC0VibuhxnScuIa8J3NHqDnp3B dWrkP3Pjq2lwpsOlyiGTNH11CCdOxKDmzgh3PZ6I=
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:09:31 -0800
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5V277PSR6AX2BNY3534GNJXEVBNHHB6PLW5A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3255/555739048@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3255@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3255@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify padding of INITIAL packets (#3255)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd4681b92549_7a173f9e548cd96c152932"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/C04dawyH3zEnYSHjVMyWuHyUgyE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:09:34 -0000

In thinking about this a bit more, I wonder if 8.1 says everything we want it to say:

_Clients MUST ensure that UDP datagrams containing Initial packets have UDP payloads of at least 1200 bytes, adding padding to packets in the datagram as necessary._

What about INITIAL packets which contain only a CONNECTION_CLOSE frame? Should those be padded? It doesn't seem terribly necessary to do this...


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3255#issuecomment-555739048

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email