Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type extensions (#58)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 06 December 2016 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311D41299C8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34AnwYkZDxnA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B243129C2F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:44:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=xBDmxOGwx78GtVU5Yk5pO3lDgQ8=; b=m+XetLv/bhmxgIWM eiMp3TwqGfaGNenFFtrrtFDbHBkE+xlk4lmBIyUAGT0Cj6SYO1NgtmQFjFiIjXZL MeG+cqIUW7e8341BFrIeoQCYHcX0O0A7upg+jGIZTy9+Z0ZWeopHw8taWcx20/18 l3HLmR2SLF66CJFo1nOZLpl+MxI=
Received: by filter0600p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0600p1mdw1-1055-58472333-30 2016-12-06 20:44:35.644350575 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id qIOTL1-RRU2FTF5btFIrWA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:44:35.589 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 12:44:35 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/58/265266820@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/58@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/58@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type extensions (#58)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_584723337d2a5_3a463f8dc17a713061883"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3O9dwQx53XAhGn2VuubhICNOzq7D8SIgEkUp ByRvMmqdKnyYFCq6NSoRrL2Rp7lhXZJlGuJup9BLisLf8O1ptmwoCLPrnDH1Fn6tUaQVxVj8cXEv0x yfysWJi3OQU9pE/17P4OF97FoObRcglfxHLba7NfrygX2ir65KtyYthZFyxPkU+yqbXYn8WmPB5+gW 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CBixINeRrXGBa7uS4V2JkdP0JL4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab6a167ff3ad96f69b961d151ca267b8ff66586fed92cf00000001145ee53392a169ce0b80d4e5@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:44:40 -0000

I should add, that we could actually do both of these if we think they both have value.  If we add a TLV one, it'd have to be a MUST support, whereas the handshake negotiation could be a MAY.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/58#issuecomment-265266820