IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] First pass at REQUEST_RST (#171)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4B112998F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:06:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teo-R3CnErYT for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50300129D61 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:06:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=551vFhWyGkWJ9pk/4FJnmAe6e0g=; b=IIh+sEzpNyHjIQZs DQFYuShqBMdi92+zjam73IT5ghgasYjXITwBFFb4jGM0ghzDGpGahKmwludDydHZ uLxQo8CWfjHE8NAtOK9wn+nsOM1bQoo2mObZlmW2JHAD0WWRwD9Pwp/1oBtc9o8P Xfry4Y1hFoctIsFdd/d+FejHkuk=
Received: by filter1113p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1113p1mdw1-30509-58900D56-9 2017-01-31 04:06:46.167002388 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id josHFsdUQOux2NsrRFWjkg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 04:06:46.144 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:06:46 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/171/c276270122@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/171@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/171@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] First pass at REQUEST_RST (#171)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58900d56861f_3df83f88938b913c13043e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1nrhpGJJqqk95iprKtb+z0tBUPk2THJjTwhe zXm/5sgxSfS3BUR+xW6RSOQfnIOHJH7oKiaBI7GD6iMxp5koxOpLS3/OhZR70N1wbk24uGbR5V0Yjo PO46lpAd7SWJrHDDmYXgSoG7g3DSt8gxjgkiFUfZVE1ANFQ5bmKE/Jm3VbV2f7GsrvRuTe+dx+QJit A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CNf4_lmOwRTBAYnR9zdt3BEaV-k>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 04:06:49 -0000

Another thing to ponder.  RST (aka reset) has all of the wrong connotations.  I think that this needs a better name.  Maybe we can finally divorce ourselves from all of the badly fitting TCP connotations.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/171#issuecomment-276270122

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status