Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considerations (#3575)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 15 April 2020 00:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B983A1398 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4AEqAagvuu6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74183A1397 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.18.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A822E004E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1586911383; bh=M9O1i5ePDLNhFyTQCp4SdQsdrgTyC8xA2UDJgJFzEaM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fPCN560eFkIQcE5+L87wc108NL2dpYrvSTUAuJBniiiRsD0fYGVSHHJ7moCwTdtdT uIHoo5FqrPQcAZoKing+17eRaHKcC/CsjWdRPrkJYJA/vltidUQ1FBoGIDfK1EgdpM UHAY5O/QKcoYpMRiFtGvd2LeIwpbB867xmFyr/KQ=
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:43:02 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4CLO7M47WFIWGHBYV4UI4ZNEVBNHHCHNTZ2Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3575/review/393386188@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3575@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3575@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considerations (#3575)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e965896ef091_25e33fa0ccccd95c2476d3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CQZL3KH27gOU9v7LGgS9smtvI1A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:43:05 -0000
@martinthomson commented on this pull request. > +designed to limit both the peak and state amounts of memory allocated by an +endpoint. I'll let you manage that :) You can be the author of an RFC erratum. The glory! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3575#discussion_r408516069
- [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security consideration… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Bence Béky
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK security considera… afrind