Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

Martin Thomson <> Wed, 30 January 2019 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD054131136 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQVfThhG_Vn0 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22CD3130EED for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548819725; bh=ILJ9+oKRqPqbDq6bHZ9vlpMNP2fuISZyrn6H2Iukkew=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ercK4XK4rD8H1hV9JteuQvHiPNpqmSsIlnhHXLuxrQGHHv/u9OkLBJCZL8IjdCa/a qY8/E7QCyDiyHjBOOlQdX5aqMrg7WjcMjFyifysFa6eDU7US66rhvSKHRA78koZvsb NBvgwTXovzT1STnaCHix0BrqW/5Tef54IQWDB0BQ=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c511d0d55cca_59fd3fa80a6d45c415179c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 03:42:08 -0000

Discussed in Tokyo: the working group believes right now that our existing defense is OK-ish.  Roberto noted that we're not current as good as multipath TCP and suggested that we might want stronger confirmation.

@ekr will take a first stab at documenting our principles with respect to what attacks we are prepared to spend effort to defend against.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: