Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD054131136 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQVfThhG_Vn0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-12.smtp.github.com (out-12.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22CD3130EED for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:42:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548819725; bh=ILJ9+oKRqPqbDq6bHZ9vlpMNP2fuISZyrn6H2Iukkew=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ercK4XK4rD8H1hV9JteuQvHiPNpqmSsIlnhHXLuxrQGHHv/u9OkLBJCZL8IjdCa/a qY8/E7QCyDiyHjBOOlQdX5aqMrg7WjcMjFyifysFa6eDU7US66rhvSKHRA78koZvsb NBvgwTXovzT1STnaCHix0BrqW/5Tef54IQWDB0BQ=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4c24331d82ecf8c8968776a87efa110150fbed5792cf000000011868df0d92a169ce17495be9@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/458800632@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c511d0d55cca_59fd3fa80a6d45c415179c"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CX7Ei9Eo2TwuNejMs-qVWQRQgKw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 03:42:08 -0000

Discussed in Tokyo: the working group believes right now that our existing defense is OK-ish.  Roberto noted that we're not current as good as multipath TCP and suggested that we might want stronger confirmation.

@ekr will take a first stab at documenting our principles with respect to what attacks we are prepared to spend effort to defend against.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-458800632