Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab351d2189c8e30dfd6cf2c377f89cd5b408d1d9e192cf0000000115fcf87192a169ce0ee9dd49@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732/review/69722772@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address validation for connection migration
 (#732)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_59e5367175449_1d5553fba9bf52f2c73319";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Cfar-GpDvl754TXXOm44imJEqBQ>

----==_mimepart_59e5367175449_1d5553fba9bf52f2c73319
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1351,6 +1355,14 @@ connection when they move networks.  This includes state that can be hard to
 recover such as outstanding requests, which might otherwise be lost with no easy
 way to retry them.
 
+An endpoint that receives packets that contain a source IP address and port that

(What does "too woolly" mean?) We as a wg haven't decided anything about connection migration yet, so I don't think we should add any normative language until we agree on what is necessary. There's a bigger design issue question here, and I think this PR is unnecessarily rushing to resolve the design issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759
----==_mimepart_59e5367175449_1d5553fba9bf52f2c73319
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p><b>@janaiyengar</b> commented on this pull request.</p>

<hr>

<p>In <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759">draft-ietf-quic-transport.md</a>:</p>
<pre style='color:#555'>&gt; @@ -1351,6 +1355,14 @@ connection when they move networks.  This includes state that can be hard to
 recover such as outstanding requests, which might otherwise be lost with no easy
 way to retry them.
 
+An endpoint that receives packets that contain a source IP address and port that
</pre>
<p>(What does "too woolly" mean?) We as a wg haven't decided anything about connection migration yet, so I don't think we should add any normative language until we agree on what is necessary. There's a bigger design issue question here, and I think this PR is unnecessarily rushing to resolve the design issue.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq8ZZ5ISi6-1qPybHKCZOcrZaDqMCks5ss9xxgaJpZM4O3IIJ">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq8IHc9V-WQxbFs4_71HTT_PIpcKyks5ss9xxgaJpZM4O3IIJ.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@janaiyengar commented on #732"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759"}}}</script>
----==_mimepart_59e5367175449_1d5553fba9bf52f2c73319--