Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address validation for connection migration (#732)
From: janaiyengar <[email-masked]>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <[email-masked]>
Cc: Subscribed <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.

> @@ -1351,6 +1355,14 @@ connection when they move networks.  This includes state that can be hard to
 recover such as outstanding requests, which might otherwise be lost with no easy
 way to retry them.
 
+An endpoint that receives packets that contain a source IP address and port that

(What does "too woolly" mean?) We as a wg haven't decided anything about connection migration yet, so I don't think we should add any normative language until we agree on what is necessary. There's a bigger design issue question here, and I think this PR is unnecessarily rushing to resolve the design issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#discussion_r144988759