Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] rate-limiting of CID issuance needs to be allowed (#2436)

erickinnear <> Tue, 12 February 2019 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2EA126C01 for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkFTqLp_XKkp for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B638F130E0A for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:36:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550011008; bh=WzwK3iu68JA5p1HdZI9DVXyEWRyIFQh70URlB/MAtOc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=hLzjy4Z+dziqR+WEaJM8YXSwkjxqWjDQMiETfg8J7UavyOv1oGeVvpsaGX/cn3+vq +nasxORCF8JB7zPoy8PMZoA/u+leRoIhcisyi7egw5Zyx8rkYnYlTz0oJWVp0tjrnK rPJ/AQ+DIpYwuDizoNPdYNqEssbk8Y1QIU7ZQjJM=
From: erickinnear <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2436/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] rate-limiting of CID issuance needs to be allowed (#2436)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c634a807aef8_26523f8b6bed45b42932b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:36:52 -0000

But isn't it not *actually* a pull, specifically for this reason? In other words, isn't it a SHOULD and not a MUST to say "please provide a new one, unless you have a really good reason that you cannot/should not", for some of the reasons highlighted above?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: