Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Some correctness issues in the HTTP/3 drafts are stream errors, not connection errors (#2511)

Lucas Pardue <> Sat, 09 March 2019 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D66127598 for <>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 06:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzEUlZi3J_p4 for <>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C393126E5C for <>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 06:34:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1552142072; bh=m7kRb/JZomLbJ2IBzB8hmitfBWhbfLfcfuR30cPJ9n4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZyKUIALi3u1JAsfKyeY0InPZbqOSWaPpiMa79aia25MVVZvShcpval7IUiU3tVcJX Gqk7zRPjyB0dzy9XAXQXUdmhFWwvC+e4XR/6eZ3rW4zvnJPMU/zLt/hc9vixXZqSnD TP6GaMwH0YZuJ3chUdfUAl3wvnVBRdSbIyjZ4ly0=
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2511/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Some correctness issues in the HTTP/3 drafts are stream errors, not connection errors (#2511)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c83cef867588_6bbf3ff64e8d45bc4992d3"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 14:34:36 -0000

Happy to spin off another issue.

> SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE (0x6):  The default value is unlimited.
      See Section 5.1.1 for usage.

Is the intent here "unlimited, but not really and I may reject at any time without sharing my limit". How is a peer that broke the rule expected to recover from such an error?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: