Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)

Igor Lubashev <> Tue, 05 November 2019 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BF212004D for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJCyLKM3dA4i for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9DB120033 for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:37:31 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572921451; bh=F8Kt2GMd3T9Zb0mZsHdPrbVMRdILRca3Z7KckLOBUIA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RA0lx8J7Tk6uelGVXwtkzpbuiSumh+6KLa1fqVzPwKL4JRZIR3c57XIi5ayEfn9TY pvW2vTcgt5SicjhYlQRPvfmxcnzochwm3TLy37Xi/pv4Cz8mvej3HKRE3b5dHF1ZDz SWTZ8M94JZI/f1Moe1A4Vd7aFzKBISYkktmHhwfQ=
From: Igor Lubashev <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc0e06be0b85_19473fe4b88cd96c11934a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:37:35 -0000

@janaiyengar See my reply to @martinthomson. What's changed is that we now have a concrete proposal and it has been validated to work on real world traffic. The lack of the above was the reason #632 was not pursued further, per the entirety of the quoted comment.

The WG may still decide not to pursue this, but it would have to be for a different reason.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: