IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lift single-packet ClientHello requirement? (#2928)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E88120823 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hllirnDPuWis for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A87C120810 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:31:51 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1563906711; bh=/B41Qyr9HdE4YywU6WXLAsWROfgSDBlRYVtLvo+sBhQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=hBwb5xWN6AuMKD1dA2N+MV//+DK6Qq8Pf1GYsC8CJLhgv4HtXc6z2zW1o8K6VATt9 woOOzNyBd68WNo9VPpSiN/p89kbQUatbdB83X5dftBCJ1kvBdyzT/9ooML4MRs9RXA Wz0PgCD9D3AFFM84NFMd10RC/jL/kZM05duufskg=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7MXIIPT3YUE7YJC7F3ISCRPEVBNHHBYH45I4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2928/514329903@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2928@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2928@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lift single-packet ClientHello requirement? (#2928)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d37529749490_27533fcc794cd9682703f7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CydGsjH2soZRpbecG4NWb1mPg8o>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:32:04 -0000

I believe a main motivation for a single packet is that it avoids binding a lot of state on the server which can be a significant DoS vector. If anything we can expect certificates to get smaller with more widespread use of EC25519. As to post quantum, lets make another QUIC version in about 30-60 years or so.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2928#issuecomment-514329903

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email