Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initial packet rule (#1987)
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <notifications@github.com> Sun, 11 November 2018 10:01 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8318A12F295 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 02:01:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrBnDxgXZUPB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 02:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B420F12F1AB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 02:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 02:01:47 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541930507; bh=VlfuK/nGWioRJxpMLSUalsXWhES6IQ3XGf+5IebDjcU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=aDqXE5HEWJNHy5glzXWC6CoHzUDIiV9Hz4EsBpsSqn92n9OAMfuKJIbdNUTFlQkvE jQKRMLb7LYA7fWGTvGE99Yn3FEafJA9XocZJ3I0/yhsbio396gEiaL3xfJSEC/h/I9 SIDq1K/Df4+64id/pL98cl+JddCW25YagLuG5sFE=
From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf089ec4c7bb40e7da5e99471fc05d9922461855792cf0000000117ffc00b92a169ce169d83c2@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1987/437657121@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1987@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1987@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initial packet rule (#1987)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be7fe0bc0bd1_72593fadf8cd45c0419756"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: tatsuhiro-t
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/D-3StHP0Y4dxVCNIBo32dQyWlq0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 10:01:51 -0000
Regarding when to stop padding Initial: > Clients MUST pad UDP datagrams that contain only Initial packets to 1200 bytes. Once a client has received an acknowledgment for a Handshake packet it MAY send smaller datagrams. Sending padded datagrams ensures that the server is not overly constrained by the amplification restriction. I think that client can stop padding Initial when it has CRYPTO frame to send in Handshake packet. This is because at this time server has nothing to send and client will retransmit Handshake packet thus no dead lock. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1987#issuecomment-437657121
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initial p… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify 1200 bytes Initi… Mike Bishop