Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)

Mike Bishop <> Thu, 14 February 2019 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AF9131213 for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:35:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUcbuYScqCKI for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398F013120E for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:35:40 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550183740; bh=Cxglg3ufqZp5IlL1atBBOG4v+V7wdZ4lER8vUay3W2Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Iy5a1f82ZmNZQKvfXpC3P1ZEmm3HZSdJMmHyrMunDoRwngtVS7N21e/aRndOqp0It VVKQYtVEnKiKnGXsAH7WwzuRlv8XAtTHIxradq2Za7cT3pYfSiHoosXYqTdx3tKyPt rAPy4/CIwWS0jvwQ6WJKlelur7q9YsLeHJGqHW1c=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2466/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c65ed3c35c36_4cff3f99b7ed45b4990b3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:35:43 -0000

I'm not clear what you mean by "a requirement to demonstrate that they don't apply before they can be forgotten/changed"?  Do you just mean the stronger statement of checking that 0-RTT data doesn't exceed the limits?  I agree that #2461 is a stronger statement, but it's also more complex to verify -- you basically have to tag the processing of every data packet that arrives in 0-RTT and apply special logic to it.

It's entirely possible that we spec #2461 and people implement #2466 as a good-enough way of achieving the requirement.  :-)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: