Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invariants (#3773)
martinduke <notifications@github.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 16:07 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E7C3A0FD3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lkA28EwkbuY4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB3C3A0FC9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-ca5950c.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.57]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1958C121B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1593014835; bh=Fgy/zUNToTO0yObHVRYWHX3vjQZFkTbz3xPo/igyNFA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=cnnW8Fk+BHoxbc5pjk/J6PeMo4VOo/qoKd0nklKzYgl1NzM33G5RQLxylmEk0TTpY TtbIM/u2GyRBPz7MIEZLurDOclZH8kULbN/eV6Ja+vIwunVb0l6KcJE1yWivv7DHoK 75IZmmokYho+3pV8TPLr0YdN68uNqCuqlNpL0mE4=
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:07:15 -0700
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2WERJLMSRZFNEPREV475NTHEVBNHHCMMOWIU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3773/648914415@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3773@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3773@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invariants (#3773)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ef37a33dc0a6_79c93f902cacd9642712dc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DEXF4xf_Ew_iv5PF-6hTG9vUS_Y>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:07:19 -0000
Good catch on manageability, though that's an Informational draft, and the thread that spawned all this was a desire for normative text. > The primary function for me is that of a commitment regarding the shape of future versions of QUIC. That's a commitment that the IETF makes, and given what I know about how good we are at keeping those commitments, that's not worth a lot. But if we accept the credibility of that commitment, it has value if it successfully constrains future QUIC versions. This sounds like an informational purpose to me. Your proposed text is fine. As for my PR, I thought we'd gathered rough consensus that something to that effect was desirable, but I'm not going to lie down in the road over it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3773#issuecomment-648914415
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invariants… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Normative Text in Invari… Martin Thomson