Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 10 December 2019 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98D21200F1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:28:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YODKQ17TojTr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0462120071 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF311C2EEE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:28:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1576016912; bh=Ioc2S3hKjE9GNKAT+1Wj86A56WKkkHPN5rhzJLiHQCw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YPx6RomFWiZz+/J0vtM7rIHBKuY5SdFprghXCek4PMySHF2w5B1hHdlaT0u/QuO/a F2JpAlHMMWpTAAvtnmKE1RN4I1DGZIWeilregpZmc9uCJdlH2yYi3n4UEiLCbERtgi HNSykmzqhlnAf3Dbzo+dZaIK9qKPSw7q2P1HEyyg=
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:28:32 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3L367TAVNWWVE7NIN37VHJBEVBNHHB6OVESM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248/c564288665@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df01c10b7c7_329c3fe7228cd96437903d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DKipGFJkyRHrR5bHCEGzTYzCEmo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:28:35 -0000

Thanks for the suggestion Ted.  To confirm, by citing the section you're normatively citing only that section, not the entire doc.  My concern is that 8085 is fairly long, and a good bit of it doesn't really pertain to QUIC.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248#issuecomment-564288665