Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make SERVER_BUSY more generic (#3709)

mjoras <notifications@github.com> Tue, 02 June 2020 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667163A041D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-X48dRyd_fr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4147C3A03F3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19662660B56 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591059040; bh=5SkqkyzR3ltoiB6Z47jk4jn5DM00A5aRGM/p7B0Q2rY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pyCUYzF6bfCOAYZ6kexBtahQnmn5PUwgQ3xyyctHpTxTT0AxpNSv9JSHBWFfgK7iH LMLMmVSowgYVwxGo6Jmk9pK+ng7ZOijsS2JUF0ddcfEgaNn7MGyJsuuiWOoHfKJFzf 2mPnwTRn7vjwv4H4henoGFmy51B/GnLh+9zFWZCs=
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 17:50:40 -0700
From: mjoras <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3Q2EAPYV4NWUNFAC544GBWBEVBNHHCK6V3Z4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3709/637203143@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3709@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3709@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make SERVER_BUSY more generic (#3709)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ed5a2609337_6e9a3fc2646cd96c16335e"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mjoras
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DP5LVwxKpQM0MRYGqIQLbYtpFiM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:50:42 -0000

+1 to leaving the current state. CONNECTION_REFUSED is generic enough to be useful in the situation @marten-seemann described, and while it's nice to have more specific error codes, I don't think there's an abundant need for a BUSY-like signal, without also getting into the business of prescribing things like time-based retry for QUIC clients.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3709#issuecomment-637203143