IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF68E12016C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTiv_HgS-H5H for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A12212008B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:26:34 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1564665994; bh=ceFy/9zJg1cDCrjR2XN9t5NAd9Cd5cjYC4sL67d00F4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=N/nugy+bXsIyzyMPCyuEPMQQUPUrU+V3nevuDsTFC6hex6XTR5FS3MBeOS6IWvRbh FCXoMTa8M6J51cJDgKQLpVWzH0ZMYH/C/ugzzhK+Ggsdr/L+MioiHrg30joNgv0ar5 dZyg1Ij0pO2grWlizq98v0NWMMtq+NNsv0SQFImc=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2JWTCLYJTD4TAKWD53KANQVEVBNHHBYVUFKY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945/517287243@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d42e88a23b78_2d123fbb598cd96837793"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DSfjUCi6Fg2hipJUvvICXbl0XNA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:26:37 -0000

I'm ok with SHOULD send immediately, but as Luca said, I don't think we can enforce this any more than we already are, so I believe implementations should function relatively well without receiving SETTINGS.

The only way to force people to send SETTINGS immediately would be to make them part of the handshake(ie: put them in transport parameters).

There's a somewhat related issue about 0-RTT and SETTINGS: #2790

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945#issuecomment-517287243

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email