Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Tue, 12 February 2019 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D126E127AC2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:08:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_GdJ9aI1spJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3D91276D0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:08:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=NWJZCWX1IXdMmGGZ8Lo+0pD1Nmw=; b=YnTshRh9J8baHntX w0eLLZma41ZF4K1d/QOiQ6SYdfX9iMLQYXO6L7vlX/KDnVn1Vi3Rn2+32GEdmyix isBAQ/ZYlMLIokAdf8mP56IUdEkdV6esnVCghsThpIHMiuvCRore9fQW3NXjPuck ZnZozn2ovxylUsNHk+eTC82Dc/U=
Received: by filter1509p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1509p1mdw1-10781-5C622A99-48 2019-02-12 02:08:25.404093919 +0000 UTC m=+277673.857566435
Received: from github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.40]) by ismtpd0010p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id F1raq9ifR4eHS_TYm4q9iQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:08:25.430 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A33400DC5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:08:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:08:25 +0000
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba2eaedfce801355a1535ef47c873312e9767645c92cf000000011879ec9992a169ce17fab1f6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365/review/202448972@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c622a992e701_8113ff5446d45c425568"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3N+2dhWP2QFsaErDBFzkh6Vn2aUtAHU04GYq FYfQd5DrLEuBUmXkwpOC/IchcNSVFsmp40E6Pgj+WRszfX3J/s/q3F9KEcqNo8Lzpuk3LgS2GMQu0S W6u+X/NVtEG/IjjmhtI619gGh/ZfsRcXTAZ8ZgIb9Xo5VUbicUK9e9WR/AsonT84oypgYQ4bnqti/V I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DhbVIh7g8hQO4_TwJTFu7bkbWJc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:08:29 -0000

nibanks commented on this pull request.



> +  max_ack_delay = 0
+  kPersistentCongestionThreshold = 2
+
+If an eck-eliciting packet is sent at time = 0, the following scenario would
+illustrate persistent congestion:
+
+  t=0 | Send Pkt #1 (App Data)
+  t=1 | Send Pkt #2 (PTO 1)
+  t=3 | Send Pkt #3 (PTO 2)
+  t=7 | Send Pkt #4 (PTO 3)
+  t=8 | Recv ACK of Pkt #4
+
+The first three packets are determined to be lost when the ACK of packet 4 is
+received at t=8.  The congestion period is calculated as the time between the
+oldest and newest lost packets: (3 - 0) = 3.  The duration for persistent
+congestion is equal to: (1 * ((2 ^ 2) - 1)) = 3.  Because the threshold was

Do you have a recommendation of some specific text to add or change that would make things more clear?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365#discussion_r255775248