Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handle reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames (#3202)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A34C120073 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEIfA2MOHMUQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B01120045 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD73F1C30B8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:46:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1573224400; bh=iUhtoy3qidIEUbqspB+HV5X9i1/H8mZINhNku9AsLN8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=kq8lEM2npLw0K9vHPuQh+9vMJxJBH8ZjDj/itTkR+OnzqAiPCaOHxn5nrgyFDQZnZ wLmxbYm0OcX0Ik7+iFaU2sDNOPDPDzC6q9WN89Tr59EeDCV8k3a9cA73SqgabU/Nz2 4UoSx6UvySC+RZgphzFwktApT/v3TfzZ96Ne+zc0=
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 06:46:40 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY2MEZ2TOR6MIP6HDF32KZFBEVBNHHB532OGU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202/c551855372@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handle reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames (#3202)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc57fd0af122_1c603f9bd12cd95c4440bf"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Di0KIHdq99EhmbxzcHZQQV6qYgY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:46:43 -0000

@MikeBishop what about RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID meaning that all IDs equal or less than that one have been retired?  That would force them to be used in order, which seems like a feature in my opinion.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202#issuecomment-551855372