Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256 (#2019)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 November 2018 13:21 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3609E130DC8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:21:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfR6MJJtbOX9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:21:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 891D4130DC7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:21:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=OqnR1N+YcGuTZg9Kd28jTynRgLg=; b=Vy74SRKyDvuvMLue rBLi0S4NYDXyTDQ+Emzaz3cA72x1ER/9XdMhv3275szAF3Se/O9OAUXL1Y+5yYMZ 9y8cyAXWD6G8735JQNnLc+7fOuHHYBUUVhpUOs+O8v57Ux+GKFuF1LcD7NFuIwuU jc+BfYD1EiVBIyxMuUyVGUZTuMg=
Received: by filter0315p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0315p1iad2-13328-5BF2B8F4-F 2018-11-19 13:21:56.304225346 +0000 UTC m=+306650.976667568
Received: from github-lowworker-97d0962.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.41]) by ismtpd0025p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id y3u9KBXJTciE6HJyp-RXVw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:21:56.245 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-97d0962.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EFC80045 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:21:56 +0000
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7ad8dd4f74d780d14279c79fde8623811da41a8e92cf00000001180a7af492a169ce16c5ca64@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2019/439890526@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2019@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2019@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256 (#2019)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf2b8f445a02_2d6a3feb8ced45c46479fc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1jmhRPqm4N+cs3NHLl9WRTuqV74KxVaNDq4N D/Qf9svQh/SNGuW1mrSpZsd0bHZ2eDIrV+F1bAfYkaqQwjQ8rhsxXyJ3Ua5ZSmb7AcqjZ+3u05RUmq zH4owZXXxoPAMLfFWrvyLc/yXGU2bVeggM05OpP2Pt+4Ap0k4HOmpVGv8M+cWoP1oFER0CqbRNDxEA Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DjDuPxBYuj-9w7zmlZHB_fHkkHE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:21:59 -0000
@mikkelfj I think that is a very good point. In other words, both of the following seem to be true to me: * many of us not only do not want to spend the effort of defining AES128-CCM8 in QUIC v1 * we are not sure what the preference of the people looking for a constrained cipher-suite would be Considering that, I tend to think that preserving agility (i.e. keep the definition for AES128-CCM8 undefined; do not talk about general restriction; let `length(pn) + length(payload)` be a per-cipher-suite constant) seems like the best approach. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2019#issuecomment-439890526
- [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256 (#2… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256… Martin Thomson