IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 04:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63FC13331E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mY6es2b8Km9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A715F132F3F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=czgRmmgq/eKCsECAd7zolof1GD8=; b=hESH7PAl59Ww13me wi0xl5r0q4s29Bp3oLXsDJ4BXsXo+iIpdJbaSh7CR7fkVzauGbSXIT8IE3UTiTI4 5GRp7Tc30MkIqOkCCduwk2R4QwIuJOFsxksjCYgWeF/PQbmbdgNXiUhdKh6I3+4A YYy8vRnU0AmO16xIRN5MKxBqCAQ=
Received: by filter1172p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1172p1mdw1-11144-59DC4F6E-8 2017-10-10 04:41:18.673015638 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id KXaOyOaYQoOKzj8Tpgm5Kg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:41:18.589 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:41:18 +0000
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abfb3ecfa21c70c0679746795d4f338f7febb131eb92cf0000000115f4116e92a169ce0df98160@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/614/335359125@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/614@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/614@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PMTUD details (#614)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59dc4f6e78dac_23ce3fce553c2f2c9218f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0YUGG+BvgMi1SXuHqA7ihaWkF4j95cpBrLw7 hMlexmnvyTZhuqk0QY46SfpIFNz8pde90P29QilPs9b8jAnY3e9QUF+M165M2yz80qOiT1EvAsD3yh TebS2y/rOuJDaMCCOfCIp2xOIW9HNstjXkGIiY41dBAlfeVLKP283fuVCWuwOzUDKB72ZqHBjNFpGD g=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DlQnXJAZWDcpmWP0us5xNY1eFFI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:41:21 -0000

Hi Magnus,

I agree that some language about probe packets would be useful and there will be a PR shortly. This will also incorporate some advice about loss response. I would very much like @ianswett to consolidate the various actions to take upon loss detection in that document, but that's another issue.

As for "challenges with ICMP feedback", the section "Special Considerations for PMTU Discovery" is specifically meant to address this. What is that missing?

Is there anything else you'd like to see here?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/614#issuecomment-335359125

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status