Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:02:54 -0700
From: Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4abc6c30ef8ae2b3650082028d4bf2fb202f9dc259c92cebac2beae92a169ce1849fab8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434/483554921@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserved versions are not version-dependent
 (#2434)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb58c2e352d2_17c03fb9288d45c01776e4";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DpOfXZu75CeFqaxDDhi7DMKiMSQ>


----==_mimepart_5cb58c2e352d2_17c03fb9288d45c01776e4
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Would it make sense to refer to the version registry (or at least its definition) in invariants? If that's all this is about, we could just call this editorial< I think.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434#issuecomment-483554921
----==_mimepart_5cb58c2e352d2_17c03fb9288d45c01776e4
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p>Would it make sense to refer to the version registry (or at least its definition) in invariants? If that's all this is about, we could just call this editorial&lt; I think.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434#issuecomment-483554921">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkqxC5i2VYKE91KXmGj_XMNFANPceYks5vhYOugaJpZM4ama_M">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq1Mq95P4-tNPVyofjoqXhzhtdWwlks5vhYOugaJpZM4ama_M.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@mnot in #2434: Would it make sense to refer to the version registry (or at least its definition) in invariants? If that's all this is about, we could just call this editorial\u003c I think."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434#issuecomment-483554921"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434#issuecomment-483554921",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2434#issuecomment-483554921",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5cb58c2e352d2_17c03fb9288d45c01776e4--