Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Padding overhead in DNS over QUIC scenarios (#3523)

Christian Huitema <> Sat, 14 March 2020 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968753A09CC for <>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id drjzr6fn0BlX for <>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6012A3A09CB for <>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:52:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584211933; bh=930Hmc1P5XVPA9bdWei7av3tomnYjELbI+SuCkbz5LE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=A4AdEYxhNRC3cOsDvZO8bFWbrp6wGL088gPUDkyHr0LyZVAsUbY02oNBOdbo4aqiv CNvUaQizW9rKU1sSZyZU2WjP0U4P2YF0E5LAMp8t5Dmc/ApvHBhayJVVWc7BSu/0ht eBJ3Fs7e8Sm4FhH/tyXNsz+WHMbTPsrouelX/FrQ=
From: Christian Huitema <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3523/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Padding overhead in DNS over QUIC scenarios (#3523)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e6d27dd67863_4fe43fd3758cd95c1108b1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:52:16 -0000

For PMTU my DNS over QUIC example shows an initial datagram of 600 bytes, including the 0-RTT packet. It could be larger with larger tokens, or if the 0-RTT packet included several DNS queries on several streams. Of course the client could send the 0-RTT requests in non-coalesced packets, but that's not always desirable.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: