Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement around close-on-ack-of-unsent (#564)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 01 June 2017 01:42 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0956B129AFC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzxxRSoSUN-C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8B4129AF6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 18:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=EEX+93VMp+8SRiqkQ9c3tIFqkd8=; b=D+JGUpVUlLVGV7B0 xMesqV6WOCaidyvgqKaosBggFU4tTA9CQdq29baI8c+gmS6qxaYt67lH8g0n06kr i7RHs+2uDaOt2e73lCYVUBLgWXjjjFI8FtgPmvBm07TFaqVy8UC2VlQh34J2W7uu B7RX/GhDHsY3w8UW/c3jL6zBxtI=
Received: by filter0991p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0991p1mdw1-26025-592F7118-47 2017-06-01 01:42:48.82962854 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id CXqExz3-QAe8vgZm_qG4aw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 01:42:48.766 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:42:48 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab28a34a0468dfc3c0d7a33369dad3a8547ee9fa5192cf000000011547331892a169ce0dde6ebe@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/564/305365280@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/564@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/564@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement around close-on-ack-of-unsent (#564)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_592f7118a84c1_7a343fbb8d85fc2c55091"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1HXNbVx0iv4Ow6uiG9kXINcmPGfE0k6/C46v pfB4JqDJJ24sLyRNpLCDyFA59xm8YTgwIsThEl3kel7ykt7cjY061vSdGs34KaZFG6Ot7WPUs7O84r h11YZWCyGJM1+/tWSHb8zdx3OmmNJVDVYeCvI0MOMe6PpyZpGvUDQ5LvZdUSGyEegOk94a8BQEhocl s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Dtp0fqkdz-bgZff81F6BzXZr-18>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 01:42:51 -0000
This seems sensible. Anything other than MUST NOT has the right effect, though I think that SHOULD is a nice spot. Of course, there are designs that would have us avoid skipping packets entirely, which reduces the state commitment considerably. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/564#issuecomment-305365280
- [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement arou… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement … Martin Thomson