Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)

Gorry Fairhurst <> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D3012041D for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdoTQ8rIRZgJ for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46031120369 for <>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:45:21 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1563896721; bh=s9ahwRpqfG6f5vnTfUIXNkwG4+Fp0WzKEigBVEQF/wg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YS+35qPuRauIKHKwqhOol6qe48tFyhI116Fjwl7rjorxskCPRfWrOSEov9KyQfNEM gO2XNWbMpFWzuWkYDXOPtZYZQCT5V7/i5K9gwcdOIBRpTdk9sLSH5r08kef/mTLz8t ucjKrs+sHFvJrrL48ExTXJ/kLi7Pb9H5srLNdwP8=
From: Gorry Fairhurst <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2143/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Be more conservative about migration? (#2143)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d372b913e05d_63d33fac7e2cd96c157288"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:45:29 -0000

Can we be careful with how we sue "off path" - I think this uses the term assuming some visibility of the packets. In many transport documents, we assume that an off-path attacker does not have a way to see the packets.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: