Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E23130DEA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:49:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7lOD40cltDj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB7012870E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:49:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Ysauhl9kneEIrziPCdgCwuj6MKI=; b=B9tFnoBRRh8419lE 3T14VtpRr1xxEIHO6DWzPfpqOCSBR4BqbJ/eE/slo61Rd2JBiXuQ2Fjmom7KV47l QljWHV5mpN1qgyq9eoduM1lHDQLY+6jFOQMd+oTMmVGvCm5F9w7uBT+lQvTlkoEJ o3lW49ETf1VJrubXVnDRyZZLbqI=
Received: by filter1161p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1161p1las1-2309-5BEB2ADF-17 2018-11-13 19:49:51.542915915 +0000 UTC m=+344844.446697752
Received: from github-lowworker-dcc078e.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.44]) by ismtpd0010p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id NNYMdMsZTZ2mznjzR5PHlw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:49:51.435 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-dcc078e.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687EB2C04BE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:49:51 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab165d476006edb35da72671dab326e3905b1e60ff92cf000000011802ecdf92a169ce169265bd@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982/review/174555606@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spin per peer (#1982)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beb2adf670ec_79dd3fc2864d45bc12662"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak15I0beeKonpR6MqSKjIGpW0PBxfWc5HxMchC nPLl1jY4FYwS7Hl+6/LYJ8ZHgA0znTnEx4SDi/PVHqasd2vtLlB6QwQ4pPwzlR5j0gRltqHeEAiiE4 HjGfXS5hCiSWFed4NHKT7D8RMgpzQQ4RWpeGQWrq5hk/V+fMpvSP0E9byaAhv9iRPUCGEz/EvEXSMe E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/E_NyOQERsSBLm0Y-dWPHdDr6gZY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:49:54 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



>  
-When the spin bit is disabled, endpoints SHOULD set the spin bit value to zero,
+The selection process SHOULD be designed such that
+on average the spin bit is disabled for at least 1/8th of the connections, or
+1/8th of the paths when doing migrations. The random choice SHOULD be dependent
+on the address of the peer, so that the spin bit is consistently enables or
+disabled for repeated connections to the same address.
+

But if you include the source address as well, doesn't that mean that most clients would ordinarily spin and a server that gets spin from clients at a near-zero rate remains suspicious?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1982#discussion_r233197831