Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify text around preferred address (#3589)

Kazuho Oku <> Mon, 20 April 2020 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB313A0C52 for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.082
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.082 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F7i_LqnAXp85 for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E11B3A0659 for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41901E1613 for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1587387195; bh=8NZnu182a3cincmtQF/+abgQSlQR1IZfwS298Y8AgIk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NRAESib5E8Wmpb5VD6pdzJgdp/PQi2UifzgtRrgMLh/JADELMAr5ieYsUfvoWkFPv zKXQGVlD4pnlUIPlkiknBEptP6ReM6pHnhUf8yjY6OklsNjpCMhKWizepQkARxHaGY ojhy1ydrw2Y7+wyOtdbKu5eUnArlEK2z1HNRxaME=
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:53:15 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3589/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify text around preferred address (#3589)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e9d9b3b2fc7c_4d9f3f8739ecd95c11002f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:53:33 -0000

@kazuho commented on this pull request.

>  {{migrate-validate}}) of that address using the connection ID provided in the
-preferred_address transport parameter.
+preferred_address transport parameter or, if that connection ID has been
+retired, any active connection ID that has not already been used on a different

I prefer @martinthomson's suggestion. For CIDs provided by NCID frames, we do not require them to be used in particular order, even when the client has received CIDs in order. I would be hesitant to to require in-order use of CID when SPA is involved.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: