IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't arm the handshake timer if there's no data (#2590)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817B212045C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCIeRQmKdJzD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A1E12045A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 07:58:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554476325; bh=9VM+ljN5tklhSKPhe79OmTnkQlRYJHDnVC3sVAcoCi0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lS9DCJLuPWYW3FtRGghVRNc8FWNcz1KrVJwU1A5IBypUjO8NP0jZO0tpmrORQbJBw arOKDGGaeZv80fbEITDEGmnEfTIAtWcxQAw5TRE3uFMZSAtiLrTE6hcsrOGGWEzMNs 1/0lcoT9G0Iihk2qdGAlNlredEjQEUrqUAj/PFaI=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab370f399f4cbc5b11d5639441b93429fa9e6ee1a592cf0000000118bf2f2592a169ce199da23e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590/review/223324236@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't arm the handshake timer if there's no data (#2590)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca76d2571e04_4993fed0bed45bc2022f8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/EizXGDkhhXicEGbFN5LGy_x_yrc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:58:49 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> @@ -435,7 +435,9 @@ Data in CRYPTO frames is critical to QUIC transport and crypto negotiation, so a
 more aggressive timeout is used to retransmit it.
 
 The initial crypto retransmission timeout SHOULD be set to twice the initial
-RTT.
+RTT.  On each consecutive expiration of the crypto timer without receiving an
+acknowledgement for a new packet, the sender SHOULD double the crypto
+retransmission timeout and set a timer for this period.

This was just a reorg.  This text is about doubling the timer after expiry when no ACKs are received.

I think the pseudocode comments are all addressed in the other PR.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2590#discussion_r272626054

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status