Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF420130DC2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcCfE6TwWC5F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-14.smtp.github.com (out-14.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7B8129C6B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531860877; bh=H4GVUG+E+1kNVtyplfdBNwANWbAZChZKBMOqQ9FiVUk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=oeETYnimQVbU7xtmjG277HXzL1LQ2WwjXBRaVu+CooEjjN6KDhTI9PVkTTmXMr90E +ffouBde4G/ZQ/AwYboKMRxNcJb4pkP38RadqxkG83/R1OknamuTaR8uKzPfyOQpSC R9Ls10tQwKm0Cxzva+T8MHmxvWJOs/cvz5G5zSY0=
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab86b61358aa701db285b95451e714f214a404b4f392cf000000011766198d92a169ce14638397@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579/405724419@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4e578d99a9f_4dc22b22700bcf58183979"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/EyRlqZC7dK3DovC3ZXxO_j48c_0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:54:46 -0000
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @ekr <https://github.com/ekr> I have heard you voice this experience > before. Why do you feel acknowledging a packet in the same or higher level > encryption level is harder? > It's less a matter of which packet you send it in but the rules for which ACKs you accept. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579#issuecomment-405724419
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Num… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham