Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] DetectLostPackets not called in anti-deadlock case (#3298)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 December 2019 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5821200FD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:08:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2ETKhWTJwly for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A1812008C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BF12C0DAE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:08:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1576134529; bh=WX4mYraWz5YPIPIpYsUqhng6fdt4AFDxIkRcxr73pkc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GREeGxyW1p82N/gTFTVx7J6TakJTOOJ4bTua9rttk9698mJ9HDAWHUGKDGZto1Ztf LUqFZdQUxINOJxfTwurl6AQii7ltsQ43R6JgMeAb0fN+5vjnroK8E7ZPGt9SkEUQhq VqhzuSqswymNjlF8xPvPV7PtPTO17YZejVsr+6yo=
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:08:49 -0800
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7PCBF6TGESE6DUEG5374NADEVBNHHB76FHYU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3298/564879791@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3298@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3298@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] DetectLostPackets not called in anti-deadlock case (#3298)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df1e78197db7_1cc3fac0f8cd96c197478"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/F7TPnCrtA6V8BJ5cgS1sAknYsps>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 07:08:52 -0000

Well, if you have only a small amount of buffers (embedded device), and you RTX without freeing up the original TX (i.e., you con't declare it lost), you end up of of buffers pretty quickly.

Since anti-deadlock is only done during the handshake, there really isn't anything to undo?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3298#issuecomment-564879791