Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add Advice and Rules for CONN_CLOSE in Initial and Handshake (#1786)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EBE130E09 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1WnoZ6Q7Nvj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6DE130DEA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:10:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1538082630; bh=Q3qpGuwi/A24X9pUtOWR22LHEGGUYdidk9JqyO/DbFY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iV8ntzQrWpAtA4GzJ7rogqFFaPDAHvfLivOZZP1/NjBv5GQAJYJAEM5Q6BjkEAmXW xIeDYwVZsbFi5nByS/aSCHJ6Suoq/W5w+3t8lu8Fuv0oJQg0Yt4hUE6VTGtIATfCiG MYkHxJbWDraitqfAI9f6dVY5OiB/+4N25wz7xJM4=
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc7f8e841ac8a0657a553778c7af7ab8546b3391d92cf0000000117c5094692a169ce159f31b4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1786/425244332@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1786@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1786@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add Advice and Rules for CONN_CLOSE in Initial and Handshake (#1786)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bad4746dd3a4_4ec13ffb3c4d45b41416be"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/FNqlIWDBLzE-iFsgJHeFGbnStE0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:10:33 -0000

In my example, we've received Handshake packets from the server, but the server may need us to process another Initial packet.

Your text is veering into the idea of implicit acks, which is a worthy but wider discussion. It also doesn't really work for clients retransmitting their FINISHED. The server has app keys, and that demonstrates nothing about receipt of FINISHED.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1786#issuecomment-425244332