Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 11 July 2018 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B846130F88 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qzNCpaFDQ1xt for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D341130EAA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:15:12 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531347312; bh=Ah2zKb4hF3/6qDzzdhPevi11bgipzmuEOD6QscYOS6A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jAL3Q/2+ViBPND8MZ/zLYliRJXGpEP8JFX54dawVyqyJl4FnI9OY4lAg/PbnvTjWP Ap4hv1yjWisszF2chswjBwx3BDTqfforwuvj2J7hWA43ltozvaRVY2A+GN2feFUbmy 3OGLf6r2n0V6Jp6e2lQvB03PcqcsCvjFq4qRGUJQ=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1781cefce9af1ab52ecc239aaf3aa7b9e67d887992cf00000001175e437092a169ce0c118d76@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203/404327701@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4681708319f_76a3ff88c59ef8832635"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/FRLBdbCooeZkepumx6nUZ0F_HSY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 22:15:16 -0000

Actually, that is in the invariants:

> A QUIC endpoint that receives a packet with a long header and a version it either does not understand or does not support might send a Version Negotiation packet in response. Packets with a short header do not trigger version negotiation and are always associated with an existing connection.

So if we want to change this, we need to change it now.  And I haven't heard any appetite to swallow that change at this point in the process.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/203#issuecomment-404327701