Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:06:49 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4abe3ab2c92a421057cd34a1acf611c1e52f1d3294692cf0000000115fd51e992a169ce0ee9dd49@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732/c337118979@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address validation for connection migration
 (#732)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_59e58fe948629_58183fbf8ccaef286987e";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/FnDXIrx21lSwZsfT7kPc11N3DOc>


----==_mimepart_59e58fe948629_58183fbf8ccaef286987e
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've removed the normative and made this more descriptive than prescriptive.  I hope that gives us the wiggle room we need.

BTW, I look forward to having the more detailed rules.  I hope that they are more comprehensible than RFC 5245 though :)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#issuecomment-337118979
----==_mimepart_59e58fe948629_58183fbf8ccaef286987e
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>I've removed the normative and made this more descriptive than prescri=
ptive.  I hope that gives us the wiggle room we need.</p>
<p>BTW, I look forward to having the more detailed rules.  I hope that th=
ey are more comprehensible than RFC 5245 though :)</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&m=
dash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre=
ad.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quic=
wg/base-drafts/pull/732#issuecomment-337118979">view it on GitHub</a>, or=
 <a href=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq6s-YFy=
0R3wQchJXQzrUyEDU0A7yks5stDXpgaJpZM4O3IIJ">mute the thread</a>.<img alt=3D=
"" height=3D"1" src=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkqzHIrG=
LCKe4_4pAKfz3pLkfxhjHxks5stDXpgaJpZM4O3IIJ.gif" width=3D"1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop=3D"action" itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/ViewActi=
on">
  <link itemprop=3D"url" href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pu=
ll/732#issuecomment-337118979"></link>
  <meta itemprop=3D"name" content=3D"View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop=3D"description" content=3D"View this Pull Request on GitHu=
b"></meta>
</div>

<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_versio=
n":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name"=
:"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"=
quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"http=
s://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6=
-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubuserconte=
nt.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","=
action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr=
afts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@martinthomson=
 in #732: I've removed the normative and made this more descriptive than =
prescriptive.  I hope that gives us the wiggle room we need.\r\n\r\nBTW, =
I look forward to having the more detailed rules.  I hope that they are m=
ore comprehensible than RFC 5245 though :)"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull=
 Request","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#issuecomm=
ent-337118979"}}}</script>=

----==_mimepart_59e58fe948629_58183fbf8ccaef286987e--