[quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (#4020)
Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 August 2020 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF6D3A0B29 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJMhSHWt9tWL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6420F3A0B20 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.62]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7BC5C0ECB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597847477; bh=BfeuufQOFfe3Jo/779IrDiXHWIVpDidYY9K4d4PRh7w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xto+9N9fMO5TlM+OOeuKGlFsDLKkY85s3qawEtHObbVWi1tZhq7vfyfP+LFgZb1IE VXMxqZFbILP09eDSJb/69Ix+lucr7EqT5j2JC2Dn82KwPQ/CmtWakIu5afgk6MqmPz Fij53Tko4FXxzLu08AXNSiUmFZfYq3xg7jAGUUd0=
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:31:17 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5GQH57QMIPD4KZGQV5JEMLLEVBNHHCRJGKO4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4020@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (#4020)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3d37b5cbbf_1513196413124c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fzm9OCa8wiX3ioz7l0NsWYCez4k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:31:21 -0000
(Broken out of #3214.) > Servers that do not support a particular version > are unlikely to be able to decrypt the payload of the packet. > Servers SHOULD NOT attempt to decode or decrypt/ - This seems like tuning? Or is the intention to protect the endpoint from an attack, please explain the SHOULD. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4020
- [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (#402… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] This seems like tuning (… Jana Iyengar