IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make in_flight the criterion for declaring loss (#2104)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 07 December 2018 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47131294D0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 02:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67G49LTJKxRM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 02:30:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFD912896A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 02:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:30:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544178604; bh=XDyimN+x/rqiceBJFOa1W+6L6x+Sgflu3wB28W3FsfU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=FVG96PltFz6akwYrSQdveMVfeBRZbEuFReclQt6pMYnqPx5XfsA3bwOY/ll4bCNhU 0OwFuAfQ1+1BlcxcllLTZf/KBnCKTNNRAiqXERRllkZYB5xKREW9ms459AwmZW/QVF hZ9xUO8JLSt7d3/J3XVlAX3oDUrFV8WDfU4gs9OI=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5b0bd224b86f5c747e6eb68456e45fb989bf8ecf92cf0000000118220dac92a169ce172626a9@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2104/c445190305@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2104@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2104@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make in_flight the criterion for declaring loss (#2104)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c0a4bac3535b_3ba43f8c114d45b81289b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/G-x6SskdSL4wkcB8DQsYTgxHAQY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 10:30:08 -0000

How about a sender self-acknowledge packets that are not ack-eliciting, for example packets older than largest acked or older than triggering TLP? Once these packets are ack'ed or self-ack'ed, they are retired from the congestion window.

Or just keep the packets out of the congestion window if that is at all feasible. I'm not really keen on the above complexity if it can be avoided.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2104#issuecomment-445190305

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status