Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 15 February 2019 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED27A130DFA for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:11:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NrUHkjifhHaG for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47ECC130E5A for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:11:55 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550193115; bh=Az2Rr4XkPOo+oy5yU7RxFBVhN/WBooBuNuE/F0duS94=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZVwSvy9jNUY3x68f8q5la+JTVsBq4tR7JxWIoYAw7iYUK2bsLmra/Gag0C+ZrFg4U 5x/A0oPQTEXYk6wdmMm8zHOaohRkjta1H4sFVDQNp36bUebrAWop5+xQctUK0ZyB65 tww2Kd14mKoxQIn3+GWglLhkpH7EwBH0lJofX3S4=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2466/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c6611db2316a_d993fa819ad45c040055d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 01:11:58 -0000

> The fuss is about adding a complex enforcement requirement that no servers will implement.

I disagree. Having permitted list of frame-types per each epoch is a sensible way of implementing a QUIC stack. In such case, you would not have PATH_RESPONSE permitted for 0-RTT packets, as an example.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: