IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Tue, 03 October 2017 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6683E132930 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGuVvHcfA8sL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1078F12EC30 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 16:14:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1507072481; bh=U8YvStDe/n7RWvL1MQTeWijdm8wT01O8AFdikJWRe2w=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=HCWromIF5riFS/6pf0vcltVqCtds8sxa9Q52mkc5TlnHIUz8xbsi45odg5oKo0Xk6 646V7bYGeMdG1p0kPbWaLAiL0OyGMD9/e22Ce/S6OpVtPbeckOF+a2Jzhk0PKAzozK UJfl94Pzqmk+C6HbUfVrRVxLaY75XU65xmd/Xqd0=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8a94655d5070a9834896c70888efb80e700ee1b292cf0000000115ebdbe192a169ce0fa74353@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59d419e16eeb8_1e92c3fc4fddd2f28381e9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/GfznmItqHtZuVty6qlWK5z3w17g>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 23:14:43 -0000

Interesting question. Picoquic and Quickly have an interop issue because Quickly acks the client finished message (client clear text) in a server clear text packet carrying an ACK. Picoquic ignores the server clear text packet because it has already sent the client finished and has moved to encrypted operation. Who is right?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status