IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] stateful routing by intermediaries (#821)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC4A132396 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJLEOtt_ZuZt for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34945126BF0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:34:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1507923271; bh=Fdp1uV9vRA3vM/vbG0TVgEl+MaPRVGyNeBAG/mqcc20=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Va2h1SZiQt4F6AuCQ/d3pR6IKRXmZwv/zO/74RXhhLJ9Kubmfo9M6/7xy0uCeOhNs +AQ6IUvyvyoY0ja8C4IWQkuxRar1Q+18qltJpY0UsqN9XE2N6ifccAxXBEQsCg+3cP JC0hImZ+srH6DUc8hqCfU4dDw2HN9lMxPluAQvCk=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9545b09a4b764590f7c934f64fc8a99bc8ea7b1992cf0000000115f8d74792a169ce0fa5b4c1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/821/336547456@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/821@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/821@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] stateful routing by intermediaries (#821)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59e115474d141_ac63ff35be46f2c1699a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/GqvhUMvizE3fg4zJygbL7XJ7W50>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:34:33 -0000

Any intermediary has to be working with teh server or the client, since the keys aren't available to an intermediary otherwise. Isn't it adequate to have the end that teh intermediary is in cahoots with not send omit_connection_id? Meaning, if this is a reverse proxy, then the server *knows* to not send omit_connection_id, and itself always sends the connection ID. Why is that not enough?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/821#issuecomment-336547456

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status