IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA17127286 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:28:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRFlnoXwla0J for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F62120724 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:28:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=H3jsr62TIh+AS1sXaK20GPVkA0A=; b=gmxwKIOE6lxOaLvR ggH9uSHUkYvP2Z2YlCMpPNGbRwdIszzhJoHt1Wjq/8Db8dwDV7myHsAAVW16lgMh vIk4kL3GRhOdntWceLMYe3Rg6agxMgXSdzgx9UsVHgEyWZ4pp7zNgORQoZYGE2tE dgQm3SqbRhvAMYqkpQpuhYS/xMk=
Received: by filter0950p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0950p1mdw1-17849-5A1EB617-17 2017-11-29 13:28:55.651532644 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id hLUwg1U6RoOFZctdOOEwtQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:28:55.562 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:28:55 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe0efda5bafdb2ed555ef9f0ee38cc9a3257d0ed992cf000000011636781792a169ce1075d33e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956/c347860169@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a1eb6175712f_4c8b3f9f180b8f281057697"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Rfxmy4arcKBrFFLL87RACbmdYhxdxg/MHdb R3zARAEiAaZ4bRB2EVCScVe/R2H1da6bQmF60Kas6R4A+eX0EPteD6Rqut4IswDI94NzFGlMmpUpts T0WKVa7zJ5gidtFDJ1BrVKNCGDUB41W3XEUDIYIiK0ZZX9400usCKR6f8aViXS6kjBlKb/fblr93xZ 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/GsmuG-ssTXaRoi-sst0KO-8agtA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:28:59 -0000

Agreed on this merging sooner than I expected.  I realize we want to nail down the type byte, but I'm still not sure why we're doing this?

@dtikhonov You seemed to think it made supporting both at once easier than before?  Is that because all the new code points are either undefined or in practice unused in GQUIC?

@martinthomson Yes, I think it would help to have a specific greasing proposal written up that deals with both coexistence of GQUIC and IETF QUIC, as well as IETF QUIC and WebRTC.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956#issuecomment-347860169

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status